Yes. Structured validation can strengthen documentation and technical defensibility in anticipation of regulator engagement.
Where inconsistencies or risk exposure is identified, structured commentary and recommendations are provided. Intrusive investigation may be recommended where proportionate.
Yes. Where strategies are historic or incomplete, we can review and validate available documentation and identify gaps requiring clarification.
No. A Fire Risk Assessment evaluates live fire risk and management controls. Fire Strategy Review validates the underlying design intent and structural fire safety assumptions. The two are complementary.
No. However, it is strongly recommended for Higher-Risk Buildings, complex developments and buildings undergoing significant change.