No. Strategy & Assurance services sit above operational risk assessments and provide structured regulatory documentation and governance alignment.
Yes. Retrospective Fire Design Strategies can be developed where original design documentation is incomplete or unavailable.
Yes. Reports can be linked to structured evidence, Fire Risk Assessments and incident data within the Compliance Operating System.
They are primarily required or expected for Higher-Risk Buildings under the Building Safety Act, but may also support governance for other complex properties.
Risk Assessments identify hazards and required remediation. Strategy & Assurance services define design intent, governance arrangements and regulatory documentation.
Yes. Reports can be linked to controlled document collections and securely shared with authorised stakeholders, including regulators.
Yes. Structured reports can be refreshed to reflect updated compliance information and incident data as required.
No. Fire Risk Assessments form part of the evidence base informing the Safety Case. The Safety Case provides overarching regulatory assurance.
The Accountable Person retains responsibility. Risk Warden supports structured development, evidence alignment and governance within a defined methodology.
Building Safety Cases are primarily required for Higher-Risk Buildings under the Building Safety Act. Similar structured assurance approaches may support governance for other complex buildings where appropriate.