It is developed collaboratively with client-supplied project information, technical expertise and where required, specialist fire safety input to ensure proportional justification and regulatory alignment.
Yes. Fire Design Strategies can inform Building Safety Case development, evidence linkage and Golden Thread documentation within the Compliance Operating System.
Yes. When original documentation is unavailable or incomplete, a retrospective strategy helps clarify design intent and support governance.
A Fire Design Strategy is commonly expected where regulatory compliance and design justification must be demonstrated — such as for Building Control submissions — particularly in new or significantly altered buildings. It supports, but does not replace, statutory assessments.
A Fire Design Strategy sets out design principles and assumptions; a Fire Risk Assessment evaluates how effectively those principles have been implemented and identifies existing hazards. They are complementary but distinct.
Yes. Retained support can align with Accountable Person duties and ongoing building safety governance requirements.
No. Retained Advisory Support complements internal competence, strengthening governance oversight and regulatory alignment.
Service frequency is proportionate to risk exposure and organisational scale, ranging from periodic governance reviews to more frequent advisory engagement.
We provide competent professional advisory support aligned to statutory expectations. Formal appointments and scope are agreed in writing, and accountability remains with the dutyholder.
Yes. Health & Safety Consultancy can align with Fire Safety Consultancy and Building Safety governance frameworks to support structured, organisation-wide compliance oversight.