Yes. We provide advisory for projects notifiable to the HSE and support dutyholders in meeting notification and documentation requirements.
We provide advisory support to Principal Designers and Clients. Where appointment is required, scope can be defined in accordance with project requirements.
CDM duties apply to most construction projects. Advisory support is particularly beneficial where projects are complex, involve multiple contractors or present elevated risk.
Yes. We provide structured review and strengthening of existing Safety Case Reports, identifying gaps in evidence, governance clarity and risk articulation.
Timelines depend on building complexity, existing documentation maturity and governance readiness. Structured readiness reviews may take several weeks, while full Safety Case development for complex buildings may require phased delivery.
No. Fire Risk Assessments form part of the evidence base informing the Safety Case. The Safety Case provides overarching governance assurance.
The Building Safety Regulator will expect to see: Clear identification of principal building safety risks Evidence of proportionate control measures Demonstrable governance and oversight Evidence-backed narrative linking risk and control Mechanisms for continuous review and improvement
The Accountable Person (or Principal Accountable Person) retains legal responsibility. Risk Warden provides advisory support, but statutory accountability remains with the dutyholder.
No. Safety Cases are primarily required for Higher-Risk Buildings under the Building Safety Act. However, similar structured assurance approaches may support governance in complex non-HRB buildings where appropriate.
Both options are available. We can provide: Fixed-scope regulatory readiness reviews Safety Case development support Retained advisory and governance oversight Annual review and refresh programmes Ongoing support is often appropriate where portfolios are complex or subject to anticipated regulator scrutiny.