No. The enhanced occupied building regime primarily applies to Higher-Risk Buildings (HRBs) under the Building Safety Act 2022. An HRB is generally a residential building that is: 18 metres or more in height, or 7 or more storeys, and contains
Timelines depend on building complexity, existing documentation quality and governance maturity. A structured readiness review may take several weeks, while full Safety Case development and evidence alignment for complex portfolios may require phased delivery.
Yes. Where delivered within the platform, findings and actions can be governed across individual buildings or entire portfolios.
Some are statutory (e.g. water hygiene and workplace safety duties), while others support compliance with equality and governance obligations.
General Risk Services complement Fire Risk Assessments by addressing operational and statutory risks beyond fire safety. Findings can be governed centrally within the Compliance Operating System for coordinated oversight across disciplines. This subtly reinforces cross-selling and structural clarity.
Yes. Services can be delivered individually or as part of a coordinated programme across portfolios, with centralised governance through the Compliance Operating System.
Yes. Where applicable, assessments use structured evaluation and risk scoring frameworks to prioritise findings and support defensible remediation planning.
General Risk Services include structured assessments covering water hygiene, workplace safety and accessibility risks across property portfolios.
No. A Fire Risk Assessment evaluates overall fire safety management and risk. A Fire Compartmentation Survey verifies the physical integrity of passive fire protection elements. The two are complementary and may inform one another.
Not always. Type 1 assessments are non-intrusive. Intrusive inspection is introduced in Type 2 and Type 4 assessments where construction detail or compartmentation integrity requires verification.